Joe Lieberman just said on FoxNews how he would be open to supporting a Republican presidential candidate (hmmm...think he has one in mind, another faux-moderate, maverick wannabe, McSomething or other?).
He once again repeated the usual Republican lies/talking points when he spewed he would support a Democrat if they "were committed to defeating Islamist terrorists" (I may be off by a word or two, but this was essentially it).
Throw aside for a second what I think is a stupid term anyhow (how about we utilize the phrase Christianist terrorists too, for those who bomb abortion clinics here and kill people for their religion in places like, let's say, Ireland?) or the fact that he looked like Alf's dad as he talked, making it hard to concentrate.
So, once again, because Democrats realize his war in Iraq is folly--that it is doing nothing but strengthening the very terrorists he claims to want to stop--somehow we are not committed to getting the people who actually attacked us on 9/11 when our president was stumbling over multisyllabic words and picking his nose in a classroom in Florida.
To those who said it would make no difference who we elected, Lamont or Lieberman, because either way we would get a Demcrat, this is what you have stuck us with.
For a trip down memory lane, here's what I had to say about Droopy The Fabricator here, here, here and here.