More federal no-bid contracts. Just what we need.
It's always a good idea to take a really bad practice and employ it more often.
Under pressure from the White House and Congress to deliver a long-delayed plan last year, officials at the Department of Homeland Security's counter-narcotics office took a shortcut that has become common at federal agencies: They hired help through a no-bid contract.
And the firm they hired showed them how to do it.
The government--surprise!--is relying less on competition for good deals for products and services. Federal spending on contracts without "full and open" competition has tripled.
Think...think real hard...what happens as a result:
Government auditors say the result is often higher prices for taxpayers and an undue reliance on a limited number of contractors.
So open competition is now the exception, not the rule. It almost seems like these guys are, oh I dunno, kinda cliquey. I could be wrong.
Keith Ashdown, chief investigator at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group, said that in many cases, officials are simply choosing favored contractors as part of a "club mentality."
Well, I wanted to be wrong. Go read the article for the gory details.
6 Comments:
It's only 9:30 am my time, and I already need a nap.
Sounds to me this is part of the Republican party pay to play scam. Support Republicans financially, and only Republicans, and you get a nice government contract with no oversight, and thus, technically, free money since all you have to do is say you are doing something and not actually do it.
So that means Bush's presidency must be part of a no-bidder. Because that just described his m.o.
Whoever's writing that history book in 50 years that Bush keeps talking about, I hope they're taking notes about stuff like this.
Don't worry, I am.
台北酒店經紀人 ,酒店工作 ,酒店公關 ,酒店兼職,酒店經紀, 酒店上班,酒店喝酒,台北酒店,酒店上班,酒店打工
Post a Comment
<< Home